Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email partnerships@19thnews.org.

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Election 2024
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Election 2024
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

LGBTQ+

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s sex discrimination fight laid the foundation for LGBTQ+ legal wins

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is remembered for changing the game for women. But her work profoundly reshaped the legal landscape for queer people.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on stage.
In the 1970s, Ginsburg took a spate of sex discrimination cases to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution barred discrimination due to gender. Those arguments would be critical to later cases on LGBTQ+ rights. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)

Kate Sosin

LGBTQ+ reporter

Published

2020-09-19 19:43
7:43
September 19, 2020
pm

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

Paula Greisen might not have fought a case before the Supreme Court had Ruth Bader Ginsburg not done it nearly half a century earlier. 

It wasn’t that Ginsburg had laid pathways for women aiming to go into law, though she certainly did. It was December 2017, and Greisen was a lead attorney on Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the famous Supreme Court case involving a Colorado baker who had religious objections to gay marriage and two men in search of a wedding cake. In a 7-2 decision, the court threw out a lower court’s ruling against the baker, finding it hostile to his religious beliefs.

Much of Greisen’s work fighting for LGBTQ+ rights has drawn on legal precedent set by Ginsburg, who dissented in the case. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“She was the architect that laid the foundation for current modern thinking about equality in our country,” Greisen said.

Ginsburg, who died Friday, created case law banning sex discrimination that set the stage for LGBTQ+ legal wins decades later. In the 1970s, Ginsburg took a spate of sex discrimination cases to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution barred discrimination due to gender. Her winning arguments cemented sex discrimination protections into Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said the world be profoundly different for LGBTQ+ people without her. 

“Without the early sex discrimination cases that she brought, starting in the early 1970s, and without her very strategic broad vision of how to persuade the court to recognize a very expansive understanding of sex discrimination, we would be living in a very different world,”  Minter said. “There would almost certainly be no sex discrimination protections for LGBTQ people.”

Minter called Ginsburg’s work the “doctrinal foundation for the marriage equality ruling for same sex couples.”

Since Ginsburg’s appointment to the court in 1993, she ruled on the most important cases impacting LGBTQ+ people. She was part of the majority that struck down sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas in 2003. She helped overturn the Defense of Marriage Act, prohibiting same-sex marriage in 2013. In 2015, she joined the court in bringing marriage equality to every state via the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling.

Looking back now, Minter is struck that one of Ginsburg’s last rulings on the court was the Bostock v. Clayton County case, which cemented LGBTQ+ workplace protections nationwide. 

“Her vision of sex discrimination law, and the broad way it should be interpreted to prohibit any type of sex-based disparate treatment, really the culmination of that vision was the Bostock decision,” Minter said. 

Although Ginsburg is often praised as a progressive voice on the court, legal experts say that much of her legacy is as an attorney who interpreted the law broadly. She viewed sex discrimination as a threat not to just to women, but to men. 

In bringing discrimination cases on behalf of a male caregiver denied a tax deduction for female caregivers, she began building case law that would later be used to protect people of all genders, including transgender and nonbinary people.

“She was able to show the court how discrimination against [the caregiver] can hurt us all, and by using the 14th Amendment in such a way, she was able to essentially pave the path and lay the foundation for our present-day understanding that any type of inequality, any type of discrimination is harmful to the country as a whole,” Greisen said. 

Jenny Pizer, law and policy director for Lambda Legal, recalls that in the 1990s, legal rights advocates hadn’t started using sex discrimination protections to fight LGBTQ+ cases.

“There was a point where we wanted to very significantly expand the scope of the domestic partner laws,” Pizer said. “And it was very clear to me that a key element of our argument had to be that it was rights and responsibilities.” 

Then, they hit a pivot point. Reframe the argument as sex discrimination, just like Ginsburg had done years earlier. 

“Let’s use it as an opportunity to get at stereotypes, which was of course a key thing, and she was the most effective person during those years showing the harm of many directions of gender based assumptions and stereotypes,” Pizer said. “That approach has been just immeasurably huge in our work.” 

Chase Strangio, an attorney with the ACLU who represented Aimee Stephens in her landmark Supreme Court case on transgender rights, said it’s important to remember that Ginsburg was also the product of people around her, people who pushed her, challenged her and taught her.  

“I want to serve credit both to her as an individual and an exceptional individual, and also the people she came in contact with and learned from that enabled her work to be what it was,” he said.

He noted that attorneys Dorothy Kenyon and Pauli Murray fought sex discrimination cases in the 1940s and 1950s, work that Ginsburg would later credit. 

“Our institutions have to be bigger, and our movements have to be bigger than any single person,” Strangio said. “It’s incumbent upon us to ensure that they are, and so, that’s the work moving forward.” 

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

Supporters of web designer Lorie Smith and counter-protesters demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court in December 2022 in Washington, D.C.
The 19th Explains: The Supreme Court’s decision in the LGBTQ+ 303 Creative case
Two people holding hands at their ewdding.
A more conservative Supreme Court could bring drastic changes for LGBTQ+ Americans
What will happen if Obergefell is overturned? Queer legal experts are scrambling
Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg poses for a photo in her chambers at the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, July 24, 2013, before an interview with the Associated Press. Ginsburg said during the interview that it was easy to foresee that Southern states would push ahead with tougher voter identification laws and other measures once the Supreme Court freed them from strict federal oversight of their elections.
‘An extraordinary force in the law:’ Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s legacy on gender equity

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Election 2024 Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Support representative journalism today.

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.