Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email partnerships@19thnews.org.

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Election 2024
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Election 2024
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion

Texas will continue its ban on abortions in medical emergencies, state Supreme Court rules

A challenge brought by patients and doctors argued that the state’s strict laws endanger the lives of people whose pregnancies develop serious complications.

Anna Zaragarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski.
Anna Zaragarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski. (Montinique Monroe for The 19th)

Shefali Luthra

Reproductive Health Reporter

Published

2024-05-31 11:17
11:17
May 31, 2024
am

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

Your trusted source for contextualizing the news. Subscribe to our daily newsletter.

Texas will continue enforcing bans on performing abortions even when pregnancies develop serious complications, following a decision issued Friday by the state Supreme Court.

The ruling means physicians must wait until patients are dangerously ill before terminating their pregnancies — in some cases resulting in otherwise preventable health complications. Under the law, learning that a fetus is unlikely to survive does not allow doctors to perform an abortion. The court clarified abortions could be performed for patients experiencing preterm premature rupture of membranes, but did not offer specifics on other circumstances that could qualify for an exception. Texas passed a law last year also suggesting abortions could be performed for patients with that specific condition, though the law requires physicians prove in court they qualified for the exception, what is known as an affirmative defense.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Under this case, known as Zurawski v. Texas, 20 women and two doctors sued the state of Texas, with many arguing that the state’s abortion laws endangered their lives. Some left the state for care. Others, including lead plaintiff Amanda Zurawski, had to wait until they contracted sepsis, a life-threatening infection, before they could receive an abortion. Some have been told they may struggle to become pregnant again as a result of medical complications they developed while waiting for an abortion.

The lawsuit, filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, did not seek to overturn Texas’ abortion bans; instead, plaintiffs wanted clarity from the state about when people facing dangerous pregnancy complications could receive abortions. Texas is the largest state in the country to have banned abortions. The Texas lawsuit also inspired comparable litigation in Tennessee and Idaho; both cases, also filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, are still ongoing. 

  • Previous Coverage:
    Anna Zaragarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski pose for a portrait near the Texas State Capitol.
  • Previous Coverage: Texas denied abortions to these women when their lives were in danger. Now they’re suing the state.

The Texas court had previously ruled against Texas woman Kate Cox in a separate but similar case; by the time the court ruled in Cox’ case, she had already left the state to receive an abortion.

The Texas court’s decision means that the state’s heavily restrictive bans — which prohibit the procedure in almost all situations, without exceptions for rape or incest — will remain in effect, even in medically complex scenarios.

Doctors in Texas and across the country have said that even when states’ abortion bans offer exceptions to save the pregnant person’s life, the language on what qualifies is ambiguous at best. Without clear guidance, medical providers aren’t always able to provide abortions when they would normally be deemed medically appropriate — when, for instance, a pregnant patient has cancer and needs an abortion before commencing chemotherapy. 

Plaintiff Amanda Zurawski poses for the portrait in the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas.
Plaintiff Amanda Zurawski poses for the portrait in the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas on March 7, 2023.
(Montinique Monroe for The 19th)

In Texas, violating the state ban is a felony and can be punished by life in prison and at least $100,000 in fines. Abortion providers can also be sued by private citizens for at least $10,000 under the state’s six-week abortion ban, which went into place before Roe v. Wade was overturned. 

A state judge in Austin ruled last summer that while this case proceeded, the state could not deny patients access to abortions when their doctors deemed care appropriate to save their life or to prevent irreversible damage to their health. The judge also ruled that physicians could provide patients with abortions if they discovered fatal fetal anomalies. 

But that ruling, issued as a temporary injunction, had little impact. Almost immediately, the state attorney general appealed the decision, using a procedural mechanism that blocked the injunction from taking effect. The state’s Supreme Court then blocked the lower court ruling. 

The state has argued that the fault is not with Texas’ abortion laws. Rather, they argued, doctors have been given all the guidance they need under the state’s narrow exception language, and said that if patients feel they are not getting needed treatment, the fault is with physicians for being unwilling to make decisions about their health.

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

Texas ruling would allow abortion during dangerous pregnancy complications
Abortion rights activists hold a protest in Austin, Texas
Texas just added exceptions to its abortion ban. Does that make a difference?
Kyleigh Thurman talks about her medical experience at her studio.
Two women say Texas hospitals wouldn’t treat their ectopic pregnancies. Each lost a fallopian tube as a result.
Abortion-rights supporters stage a counter protest in front of the Supreme Court during the 50th annual March for Life rally.
The 19th Explains: Could an emergency medicine law give pregnant people access to life-saving abortions?

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact community@19thnews.org for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Election 2024 Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Support representative journalism today.

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.