Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email partnerships@19thnews.org.

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Let’s talk menopause

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

Menopause, without the noise

Let’s talk about it, in your inbox every Tuesday.

[altcha]

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Strategic Plan
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics, policy and power. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

Menopause, without the noise

Let’s talk about it, in your inbox every Tuesday.

[altcha]

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Strategic Plan
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics, policy and power. Read our story.

Menopause, without the noise

Let’s talk about it, in your inbox every Tuesday.

[altcha]

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Business & Economy

Women’s clothing is often more expensive — and it’s partly due to tariffs

Two Democratic members of the House are pushing for a study of ‘pink tariffs.’

Rep. Brittany Pettersen speaks to media.
Reps. Brittany Pettersen (pictured) and Lizzie Fletcher reintroduced a bill calling on the Treasury Department to study “pink tariffs” and their impact on consumers.

Marissa Martinez

Economy Reporter

Published

2025-03-11 09:06
9:06
March 11, 2025
am

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

Even tariffs on imported clothing can have a gender bias.

A bill from two Democratic representatives would investigate the “pink tariff,” which encompasses the higher tax rates on imported items classified as women’s goods.

The bill, reintroduced this session by Reps. Lizzie Fletcher of Texas and Brittany Pettersen of Colorado, would ask the Treasury Department to study these “pink tariffs” and their effects to see if the burden of paying them eventually falls unevenly on consumers. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“Before all the tariff conversation this year — we’ve had this bill since last year [and] unfortunately, women pay more for the supplies that we use,” Pettersen told The 19th. “We’re getting taxed on things that we rely on … so it’s about bringing equity around tariffs so that women aren’t paying more.”

Incoming clothing is classified by gender through government textile codes, and the tariffs on them aren’t always equal. Importers would pay a 8.5 percent tax rate for a men’s anorak, for example, while a woman’s coat in the same category is taxed at 14 percent. Even clothing that would eventually be labeled as “unisex” in stores is automatically tariffed as though it were women’s garments, per the government code, bearing those same, often-higher rates.

In a Republican-controlled Congress, the bill is highly unlikely to advance to a floor vote or beyond to become law. But as more Americans become aware of how companies can pass higher foreign import costs onto consumers, the representatives said they want to press the government to do more to even out shoppers’ experiences. President Donald Trump has threatened, enacted and rescinded tariffs repeatedly against several countries this year, including China — whose share of clothing imports to the United States has fallen over the past decade.

“Now, as President Trump has imposed tariffs and started a trade war with our trading partners, it is even more important that we understand how higher tariffs will raise costs for everyone, and women in particular,” Fletcher said in a news release.

The United States is the world’s largest single-country importer of apparel, which makes up around three-quarters of the country’s total tariff burden. Uneven rates based on gender create  some deep divides for consumers across the economy — on average, tariffs are 3 percent higher for women’s clothing. 

Companies importing the goods pay the tariff, but that price is often passed onto the consumer. However, these import taxes are just one factor among others that create price differences, including marketing and different ingredients or product makeup.

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

A woman opens an order from fast fashion e-commerce company Shein.
Your Shein and Temu purchases are about to get more expensive
Millions of immigrant families would be shut out under new child tax credit proposal
A teacher comforts a young child at a daycare as other toddlers play.
Expanding the child tax credit has some Republican support. Now what?
Federal workers hold signs in a rally at Upper Senate Park in Washington, D.C.
How women have been impacted by Musk-led federal layoffs

Menopause, without the noise

Let’s talk about it, in your inbox every Tuesday.

[altcha]

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email community@19thnews.org to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at community@19thnews.org.

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Support representative journalism today.

Learn more about membership.

  • Give $19
  • Give $50
  • Give $100
  • Any amount
  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
    • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • Strategic Plan
    • 19th News Network
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • The Amendment
    • Menopause
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.