Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email partnerships@19thnews.org.

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

Daily Newsletter

A smart, relatable digest of our latest stories and top news affecting women and LGBTQ+ people.

Look for a confirmation sent to

Did you mean

The email didn't go through.

or Contact us for support
  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Strategic Plan
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics, policy and power. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

Daily Newsletter

A smart, relatable digest of our latest stories and top news affecting women and LGBTQ+ people.

Look for a confirmation sent to

Did you mean

The email didn't go through.

or Contact us for support
  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Strategic Plan
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics, policy and power. Read our story.

Daily Newsletter

A smart, relatable digest of our latest stories and top news affecting women and LGBTQ+ people.

Look for a confirmation sent to

Did you mean

The email didn't go through.

or Contact us for support

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Politics

Head Start can still use words like ‘race’ and ‘women’ for federal funding, judge says

Providers notched a legal win this week when a judge temporarily halted the administration’s requirements for grant applications. 

A child plays with dolls at a Head Start program at Alliance for Community Empowerment.
A child plays with dolls at a Head Start program at Alliance for Community Empowerment in Bridgeport, Connecticut. (Jessica Hill/AP)

Lauren Nutall

Reporting fellow

Published

2026-01-09 13:17
1:17
January 9, 2026
pm
America/Chicago

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

A federal judge has blocked efforts by the Trump administration to curb diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within Head Start early child care programs, which included attempts to revoke funding from providers who use words like “women” and “race” on grant applications. 

Wednesday’s temporary injunction, which also prevented mass layoffs for the program, is the latest development in a legal battle between Head Start programs and the Trump administration, as the president continues his attempts to erase DEI and accessibility measures across federally supported programs. 

In December, Head Start providers and two advocacy groups said in a court filing that the Trump administration had threatened to withhold funding for Head Start programs that use certain language — including words like “race,” “bias,” and “equitable” — on grant applications.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Plaintiffs, including Head Start programs in Pennsylvania, Washington, Wisconsin and Illinois, argue that the removal of DEI initiatives and inclusive language is contradictory to Head Start’s mission.

The ban on language “that they have been trying to implement really is contrary to what the Head Start providers are required to do under federal law, under the Head Start Act,” said Jennesa Calvo-Friedman, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, which filed the lawsuit. 

In May, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined his plans to preserve Head Start programs in a letter to congressional lawmakers, assuring that they would receive funding as long as they remained “consistent with Administration priorities” — as the administration was cracking down on DEI measures. This promise came after a leaked HHS budget draft reportedly suggested eliminating program funding altogether amid extreme health cuts. 

The administration’s attempts to restrict Head Start have faced previous setbacks in the courts. In September, a judge ruled that HHS could not exclude families from receiving Head Start services on account of their immigration status. 

  • More from The 19th
    A collage shows a man in a at a podium with microphones, set against the U.S. Capitol and a purple background. Surrounding elements include a torn American flag, a hand holding a Bible, a “2025” date marker, a Republican Party emblem, a protest sign reading “Jesus saves,” and a stylized illustration of a uterus
  • How much of Project 2025 has actually been accomplished this year?
  • Trump revokes federal diversity, equity and inclusion guidelines
  • When did caring for America’s most vulnerable kids become political?

For more than 60 years, Head Start has served economically disadvantaged families, disproportionately  Black or Latinx. Trump’s proposed conditions for funding will affect program directors’ ability to adequately serve these communities, particularly people with disabilities.

Calvo-Friedman shared that one Head Start Director in Washington was forced to remove from a grant proposal a plan to provide educators specialized training in teaching children diagnosed with autism. Children with autism account for at least 10 percent of the kids the director serves.

“The director of the program was like, ‘I need my teachers to have training in this so that these kids can be able to get equal access to education’ and they put that in their grant application and were told that they had to take it out,” Calvo-Friedman said. “And so I think it creates this absurd situation where it’s like, how do you serve kids with disabilities if you can’t use the word disability?”

The administration’s efforts could significantly undermine the program, which already faced a major setback in November during the federal government funding freeze when it was forced to close sites in 17 states and Puerto Rico.

“It would be absolutely devastating on children, on families and on the economics in entire communities,” Calvo-Friedman said. “For children, it would mean immediate loss of early childhood education, which has been shown to be critical in being ready for school and then having opportunities to succeed for the rest of their life in the future because they were able to be prepared to succeed in school. So it really would be cutting off opportunities to children.”

The program can also provide critical support for parents, who especially in rural areas may lack other options for child care, Calvo-Friedman said. 

“What they’re trying to do by making it impossible for Head Start programs to do what they’re legally required to do is one, make it more difficult to run the program,” Calvo-Friedman said, “but two, erase entire communities from those that are being served.”

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

Children play at a playground silhouetted against the sun above them.
When did caring for America’s most vulnerable kids become political?
Children sleep during nap time at Minnesota Child Care in Minneapolis.
Here’s what’s really happening with child care fraud in Minnesota
A teacher works with her students on a reading and writing lesson at Head Start program.
Head Start programs begin to shutter, leaving 65,000 kids at risk
ICE arrests are forcing American moms to leave their jobs

Daily Newsletter

A smart, relatable digest of our latest stories and top news affecting women and LGBTQ+ people.

Look for a confirmation sent to

Did you mean

The email didn't go through.

or Contact us for support

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Support representative journalism today.

Learn more about membership.

  • Give $19
  • Give $50
  • Give $100
  • Any amount
  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
    • Gift Acceptance Policy
    • Financials
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • Strategic Plan
    • 19th News Network
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • The Amendment
    • Menopause
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.